Friday, December 01, 2017
Italy’s biggest oil firm is accused of polluting an area where experts found more toxic substance than water in the sea.
Everyone in the Sicilian town of Gela knows someone who has been hit by the health crisis that has gripped the town for decades.
Mortality rates are higher than elsewhere on the island, and the town has an unusually high rate of birth defects, including the highest rate in the world of a rare urethra disorder.
“There were tragedies that happened daily in the city,” said Luigi Fontanella, an Italian lawyer who began gathering testimony on the health of Gela’s 70,000 residents in 2007. “Everyone in Gela had a relative, a friend and often a child suffering from serious ailments.”
Fontanella found that hundreds of children had been born with congenital anomalies including hypospadias – the urethra disorder – cleft palates and spina bifida.
Local people have long blamed pollution. A 2011 study by the Italian health service drew a similar conclusion: dozens of babies were dying in the womb or within a week of being born every year from complications caused by environmental contamination.
Now, 10 years into a battle to assign criminal responsibility for the town’s health problems, the Italians living in this wasteland feel like they may be a step closer to justice.
Last week prosecutors brought charges of environmental pollution against five managers of Eni, Italy’s largest oil company, which has run an oil refinery in Gela for 54 years.
The prosecutors said Eni for years had been illegally hiding tonnes of toxic waste in a three-mile-long undersea dump off Sicily.
If convicted, the Eni managers could face up to six years in jail. Contacted by the Guardian, Eni said it was “waiting for the decision of the judge” and that it trusted the work of its managers in Gela.
Eni said there was no evidence that malformations were caused by emissions from its refinery rather than other factors such as smog or other substances present in the air.
In 2007, Fontanella asked the local court to investigate the correlation between the high rate of birth defects and pollution from the refinery, which residents nicknamed “the Monster of Gela”.
The court accepted his proposal in 2012 and commissioned environmentalists, doctors and geneticists to study the links.
The experts’ study concluded in 2015 that the sea around Gela was so polluted that it was “technically incorrect to talk about the toxic contamination of the water”.
“The toxic contaminant should be less than, in this case, the water,” they wrote. “Gela seems to be the opposite: it is the water that is the contaminant of the toxic substance.”
The alleged victims include 20-year-old Kimberly Scudera, who has spina bifida – a severe condition where the spine and spinal cord do not develop properly in the womb – and uses a wheelchair.
The court-commissioned doctors said of her condition: “The technical commission unanimously believes that the possibility that Kimberly Scudera’s spina bifida has been caused by the presence of chemicals in the environment (air, water, nutrition), produced by the industrial plant, is entirely concrete.”
Scudera is an Italian archery champion training to participate in the 2020 Paralympics. Her family has sought – but not received – payment from Eni for her care. She lives in an apartment on the second floor of the family home. Her family does not have the money to build a lift. To take her to training each day, Scudera’s mother carries her down the stairs on her back.
“It’s considered almost ordinary here, something we’re all used to,” Scudera said. “Of course I feel angry.”
Eni said the study “hasn’t reached appreciable results’’ and “in this context, no reparations is being considered”.
Eni reached the same conclusion about Nicolò Pace, 15, who was born with a severe cleft palate. In order to pay for Nicolò’s care, his father, Antonio, has accumulated heavy debts.
“This is crazy,” Antonio said. “If we’ll ever get a reparation cheque, the money will all go to my son, for his future, so that he can begin doing what he wants in life, after years of suffering.”
In March, Fontanella asked the local court to seize the farmland around the refinery, to prevent people from eating products linked to the birth defects. Fontanella also asked for €20m (£18m) in compensation for 100 of the affected families.
The court has not yet commented on these requests.
Gela’s chief prosecutor, Fernando Asaro, who has led the investigation alongside the local branch of the Italian coastguard, said: “On the one hand, the petrochemical plant has provided work for a large number of families here. On the other, its presence has heavily polluted the air, water and subsoil of the area, causing tumours and genetic malformations among the population. It was our duty, especially with regard to these people, to intervene.”
As early as 1998, the Italian state – which holds a stake in Eni – recognised the potential link between the refinery and the town’s health problems. That year, the environment ministry included Gela on a list of highly contaminated areas. The government recommended that Eni carry out what it called remediation works – to decontaminate the area – with an estimated cost of €127m. The works were never completed.
Fontanella said the fight for justice was far from over. “I don’t feel like a lawyer in this trial. I feel more like a captain of a ship, sailing in a stormy sea. And I will fight those waves until the end, until my clients receive what Eni has taken away from them.”
Thursday, November 16, 2017
From now on, the Italian oil giant Eni has its hands tied and will no longer be able to kill its whistleblower like it trie to do with me from 2001 to the present day!
The Italian parliamentarians approved the "Protection to the Whistleblower Law"!
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
Thursday, November 09, 2017
Babies in Nigeria are twice as likely to die in the first month of life if their mothers were living near an oil spill before falling pregnant, researchers have found.
A new study, the first to link environmental pollution with newborn and child mortality rates in the Niger Delta, shows that oil spills occurring within 10km of a mother’s place of residence doubled neonatal mortality rates and impaired the health of her surviving children.
Crucially, oil spills that occurred while the mother was still pregnant had no effect on child or neonatal mortality. But even spills that happened five years before conception doubled the neonatal mortality rate from 38 deaths to 76 deaths for every 1,000 births, the data found.
“The results from the study are absolutely shocking,” said Roland Hodler, an economics professor from the University of St Gallen in Switzerland, who led the study. “I didn’t expect to see this effect on pre-conception. Why we don’t find a stronger effect [on the foetus] during the pregnancy is not entirely clear – maybe it is due to the cumulative contamination of crude oil in the water and soil, which increases over time. But that doesn’t explain the entire effect.
“This is a tragedy. Even four to five years prior to conception, an oil spill still matters. I think this should be seen as a first-world problem for something to be done.”
Regular, uncontrolled spills have been a prominent feature of Nigeria’s oil industry – the nation’s primary source of GDP – since crude was discovered there more than 60 years ago. An estimated 240,000 barrels of crude oil are spilled in the Niger Delta every year, polluting waterways, contaminating crops, and releasing toxic chemicals into the air.
A 2011 report by the UN Environment Programme estimated that, after decades of repeated oil spills in Ogoniland, it would take 30 years to reverse damage to public health and the regional ecosystem.
Unborn and newborn infants are most vulnerable to oil-related pollution because they have not yet developed basic defences such as the blood-brain barrier, which helps protect against toxic chemicals, the study found. Even small doses of pollution are likely to be large in comparison to an infant’s body weight, while mothers who ingest poisoned food or contaminated water are also at greater risk of maternal malnutrition and sickness, potentially increasing infant mortality risks, said the researchers.
By pairing georeferenced data from the Nigerian Oil Spill Monitor – which recorded the location of more than 6,600 spills between 2005 and 2015 – with the 2013 national demographic and health survey, Hodler and his colleague Anna Bruederle were able to map oil spill locations in relation to neonatal and child mortality rates among the surrounding populations. The result was an analysis of roughly 5,040 children born to 2,700 mothers in 130 clusters, all within 10km of the closest oil spill.
The researchers then compared siblings’ health histories, contrasting the mortality rates of infants conceived or born before the first nearby oil spill with those conceived or born subsequently.
The data proved that neonatal mortality was higher the closer the oil spill was to the mother’s location, and that any oil spills prior to conception increased the incidence of low weight-for-height, notably in the first year of life.
The Nigerian government did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
Activists have called the findings “disturbing and disheartening”.
“It is shocking to consider how many children may have died in the past 50 years – since oil exploration started in Nigeria’s Niger Delta – as a direct result of regular and uncontrolled oil spills,” said Debbie Ariyo of Africans Unite Against Child Abuse, a charity that supports the rights and welfare of African children.
“The ongoing environmental damage means that more children are exposed to harmful chemicals in polluted drinking water, air and food produce. Simply put, as long as the oil spills continue unabated and clean up of the region is delayed, then unfortunately more children will be harmfully impacted.”
Additional reporting by Emmanuel Akinwotu
Wednesday, November 01, 2017
Thursday, August 17, 2017
Tuesday, August 01, 2017
In commemoration of the 16th anniversary of the dismissal of a "whistleblower", the Italian oil giant has received a "gift": a "Criminal Complaint" against all the members of the Board of Directors of Eni, that was filed in Brazil's Criminal Court.
Soon, the Chairman, the CEO and the rest of Directors will be "defendants" for "Crimes against Honor" of this whistleblower because of the practice of "slander", "libel" and "defamation".
Get to know more about this Criminal Complaint in this LINK and this story browsing this blog.
Monday, July 10, 2017
The Italian oil giant Eni, through the D'Ercole Law Firm, had the audacity to send me this correspondence on July 10, 2017.
Who decides whether the people that integrate the Board of Eni committed a "crime against my honor" will be the Justice from my country.
The "Criminal Complaint" is already being finalized and soon will be filed by the Brazilian Criminal Court.
Wednesday, July 05, 2017
I was already expecting it! Eni is a company without character! The Italian oil giant didn't make a "Public Retraction" to undo the slander and defamation done against my person.
Now, my lawyer will prepare the "Criminal Complaint" against all the members of the Board of Eni for practicing "Crimes against Honor".
Monday, July 03, 2017
Today the deadline given to the Italian oil giant Eni to make a "Public Retraction" and thus, undoing the "slander" and "defamation" done to my person expires.
Starting tomorrow, the members of the Board of Directors will be denounced to Justice for "Crimes against Honor".
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
The D-Day for the Italian oil giant is coming! Eni has until the 4th of July to make a "Public Retraction" to undo the slander and defamations done to my person.
Otherwise, each of the people who are members of the Board of Directors of the company will be denounced in Brazil for "Crimes against Honor".
Note: Read the "Request for Public Retraction" made to Eni.
Friday, June 23, 2017
Today is World Whistleblowing Day! #WWBD2017
The Italian oil giant Eni doesn't like whistleblowers, it especially doesn't like me!
Monday, June 19, 2017
Chairman of the Board
Rome - Italy
Copy: Dr. Marco Bollini (Chief Legal Officer)
Douglas Linares Flinto, former executive of the Brazilian subsidiary of Eni, and founder & CEO of the Brazilian Business Ethics Institute, by his undersigned attorney, through this correspondence, set out the following for the purpose of making a request to Eni SpA and, if not met, inform all members of the Board of the company about the measures that will be taken in Brazil on account of the incurrence of "Crimes against Honor".
However, it is necessary to review the history and the reasons that motivated the original acts, duly substantiated by extensive documentation, including witness testimony, which confirms that Mr. Flinto has identified unlawful acts practiced by employees of Agip Brazil and that Mr. Flinto acted in accordance with what determines the Code of Ethics of Eni and encourages all its employees to protect the name, image, reputation and equity of company.
In this way, in 2001, in the exercise of his functions at Agip Brazil, Mr. Flinto, after learning about the practice of internal fraud and corruption, and motivated by the words and spirit of the Code of Ethics of Eni, provided the complaint to the internal channels of the Brazilian subsidiary of Eni, about a scheme that diverted millions of dollars from the company's coffers in Brazil.
Fraud and corruption in the Brazilian subsidiary of Eni
The illegal acts, practiced by the employees of Agip Brazil and that were in total non-compliance with Code of Ethics of Eni, are indisputable facts, since the Public Ministry of the State of Mato Grosso, through the 12th Criminal Prosecutor of Cuiabá, reported to the Criminal Judge all the illegal acts. This report described the crimes committed by Agip Brazil’s employees in collusion with owners of gas stations and fuel carriers. These crimes involved fraud, corruption and tax evasion (Doc. 01).
Mr. Flinto is a whistleblower
It is also indisputable the fact that Mr. Flinto is a "whistleblower". It was Mr. Flinto who complied with the determinations of Eni’s Code of Ethics and provided the complaint to the internal channels of Brazil. In "legal documents of public faith", Mr. Aldo Locatelli (Doc. 02), president of SindPetroleo - Union of Gas Stations of Brazil and Mr. Mateus de Campos Martins (Doc. 03), Advisor of Sales of Agip Brazil, confirmed that Mr. Flinto was the one who provided the complaints about the unlawful acts committed in Agip Brazil. Mr. Flinto's behavior was only and exclusively because that was the determination of the Code of Ethics of Eni.
Dismissal in "reprisal"
However, contrary to all expectations as to the consequences of his acts in favor of Eni, as well as of the principles and values present in Eni's Code of Ethics, a few weeks after reporting to the internal channels of Agip Brazil, Mr. Flinto was fired.
1st version of Eni on the dismissal of Mr. Flinto
Because he believed he had suffered the worst reprisal an employee could ever suffer, and again, following the determinations of Eni's Code of Ethics, Mr. Flinto invoked Agip's "Ethics Commission" in Brazil. Days later, the CEO of the Brazilian operation sent a response from his own e-mail to Mr. Flinto (Doc. 04) saying that:
“I received your email of February 1st 2002 and we appreciate your congratulations and observations about the changes we promoted at the Cuiabá Regional.
We find strange, however, your collocations that your dismissal from the company had occurred due to a “breach of trust”. That does not correspond to the reality of the facts. Your dismissal resulted from the administrative and organizational restructuring of the Cuiabá Regional. Being so that your contract was rescinded normally, with no just cause, having Agip even spontaneously maintained benefits after your dismissal, as, for instance, medical assistance extended to you and your dependents.
We find unnecessary your references to Eni’s Code of Ethics, given that such have always been and always will be the master line of all of our actions”.
This was the first version on the dismissal of Mr. Flinto.
What does the Brazilian Labor Court say?
It is important to note that the Brazilian Labor Court affirmed that there was a Code of Ethics, confirmed the occurrence of internal fraud and acts of corruption at Agip Brazil and acknowledged that Mr. Flinto lodged complaints against the internal channels of Eni's Brazilian operation (Doc. 05).
2st version of Eni on the dismissal of Mr. Flinto
In 2010, Eni filed a lawsuit in the Civil Court of Rome against Mr. Flinto and against the Brazilian Business Ethics Institute, demanding a compensation of 15 million Euros. In inicial petition (Doc. 06) Eni says:
“We also point out that from the insights made by Eni, it doesn’t appear that any retaliation was committed, nor a violation of the Law and, much less, the principles of Eni’s Code of Ethics, at the expense of the employee on the part of the former subsidiary Agip Brazil and, especially, on the part of Eni.
On the other hand, it is important to emphasize that Douglas Flinto’s dismissal had full justification in his reticent and not collaborative conduct taken by the employee during the company’s undercover investigations that aimed to reveal potential harmful acts to the company itself, ceasing the trusting relationship”.
This was the second version of Mr. Flinto's dismissal without Eni having submitted one single proof on its charges.
Parallel State: The first investigation against Eni
In March 2016, the story of Mr. Flinto, lived with Eni, was published in the investigative book "Eni: The Parallel State" (Doc. 07) written by journalists Andrea Greco and Giuseppe Oddo. Mr. Greco wrote (Doc. 08) to Mr Flinto that: “The authors decided to include your story because, after reading most of the documents you sent and talking with their sources, they convinced themselves that the story had roots, and that was right and interesting to include it in the context of “Stato parallelo”.
The 3rd version on the dismissal of Mr. Flinto
In April 2017, Mr. Mauro Meggiolaro, as "Critical Shareholder" of Eni (shareholder Fondazione Finanza Etica - Gruppo Banca Etica) took the case of Mr. Flinto to the Eni Shareholder's Meeting held on the 13th of April 2017. Under Italian law, Mr. Meggiolaro wrote 10 (ten) questions about the history of Mr. Flinto (Doc. 09). These questions would have to be answered by the Board of Eni. However, the members of the Board of Directors of the company did not answer to the questions that were individually formulated to them and preferred to respond in a long text (Doc. 10). In this text, once again Eni "invented" a new version on Mr. Flinto's dismissal:
"The former employee was fired together with other actors of unlawful behavior, by reticence, for having violated the obligation of confidentiality and by trying to use instrumentally Eni's Code of Ethics to gain personal advantages of the company".
This was the third version of Mr. Flinto's dismissal without Eni having submitted one single proof on its charges.
With each new version the damage to Mr. Flinto is greater
It is easy to see that in 16 years Eni presented three different versions on Mr. Flinto's dismissal, distorting, at each new version, the facts that originally motivated the complaints lodged by Mr. Flinto. It is also anincontrovertible fact that one version was more false and liar, more harmful and damaging than the other.
In the 1st Version, the company denies the "complaints" made by Mr. Flinto and denies the "retaliation" practiced by Agip Brazil, claiming that it is only a simple and ordinary "administrative and organizational restructuring". In the 2nd Version, Mr. Flinto "did not collaborate" and had a "reticent stance" when Eni carried out "secret investigations" in Brazil. And, surprisingly, in the 3rd Version, he says that Mr. Flinto was criminally involved in the scheme of internal fraud and corruption (which he himself denounced), and that his dismissal occurred along with the other actors of "illegal behavior". In addition, he accused Mr. Flinto of "reticence", of not having preserved "confidentiality" and of being an "opportunistic" person because he had used Eni's Code of Ethics (which he himself fulfilled in full) to build an untrue history with the intention of obtaining financial advantages of Eni.
The 3 versions of Eni try to hide the truth
It is clear that Eni tries to hide the truth from the facts by presenting three different versions on Mr Flinto's dismissal.
Eni's cunning returns against the company itself, as it is more than evident that Eni doesn’t want to admit the truth: that Mr. Flinto was dismissed in "reprisal" after denouncing a million-dollar scheme of corruption in Agip Brazil.
In 16 years Eni does not admit its mistakes
It is to be noted that in all those years Eni doesn’t admit its mistakes in relation to Mr. Flinto. It is undisputed that he: (a) simply complied with the determinations of Eni’s Code of Ethics; (b) that Mr. Flinto was the "whistleblower" who stripped away the dark facts that were happening in the innards of Agip Brazil; (c) that Mr. Flinto denounced a millionaire fraud and corruption scheme at Eni's Brazilian subsidiary, providing the company with the necessary measures to correct such non-conformities with the Code of Ethics and to stop the millionaire deviations in the coffers of Agip Brazil; (d), nor did it finally admit that Mr. Flinto was dismissed in "reprisal" when he should have been protected by the instruments present in Eni's Code of Ethics.
Questions and answers before the Shareholders’ Meeting 2017
Furthermore, on April 13, 2017, Eni began to hurt Mr. Flinto's honor more deeply by presenting a completely fanciful and lying, unfounded and unjust version, cruel and cowardly, and harmful and damaging on the dismissal of Mr. Flinto. Even worse, Eni, when it published the Questions and answers before the Shareholders' Meeting 2017 on its corporate website, on the page dedicated to the company's shareholders and investors, publicly exposes Mr. Flinto, giving him false and liars accusations, with negative reflexes, not only in Italy and Brazil, but in the whole world.
Eni could already be considered responsible for interrupting Mr. Flinto's professional career, since after his dismissal in Brazil (2001), Mr. Flinto was vetoed in the Brazilian labor market and never again was able to get a new executive position. Without a job, for years, he can no longer pay monthly the amounts owed to INSS (Instituto Nacional de Seguridade Social). Today, Mr. Flinto is a man almost entering the third age and no longer has the legal right of the financial values paid by the Brazilian government as "retirement”.
Brazilian Business Ethics Institute
It is also important to note that the third version presented by Eni and published by the company on its corporate website, with flagrantly slanderous and defamatory content, has immensely detrimental potential to the Brazilian Business Ethics Institute, an institution that Mr. Flinto founded in 2003 and which , In all these years, has been promoting the "best practices" of Ethics both in business and especially in the student environment.
How can the founder and CEO of an institution that fosters Business Ethics, which was conceived and created precisely because of the facts he experienced in the case of Eni, be accused of having participated in the crimes he himself denounced? How would it be possible for Mr. Flinto to be an opportunistic person, whose objective is to obtain personal financial advantages, using the Code of Ethics if this was this document that motivated him to denounce the irregularities that he himself identified? Which companies would be comfortable associating their brands with the institution led by Mr. Flinto? To make these accusations we observe that there is no sense of logic, no foundation and no sense at all, if we carefully analyze the facts ascertained and illustrated in the rich documentation already mentioned and made available for consultation.
In fact, Mr. Flinto, in all these years, has been tirelessly and incessantly pursuing, rescuing and restoring his name, his honor, and his reputation that are being denigrated by Eni to this day.
Wounds and Sequels
Eni's attitudes over the past 16 years are causing wounds to Mr. Flinto and will take a long time to heal, leaving sequels and harmful consequences for life. Eni, in addition to not recognizing its mistake, acts in a very unorthodox way, slandering and defaming Mr. Flinto. The reflections of the acts committed by Eni against Mr. Flinto may well be illustrated by two Brazilian jurists:
“The dishonor, the bad fame, pursue someone like an enormous stain, an irreversible stain. The tranquility of their conscience, the inner health of their character, does not count in the always prejudicial judgment of the surrounding world. The stain of injury and defamation is what stands out most prominently before all in a judgment of obliquity and whispers that never ends”;
“A wounded person by dishonor, their reputation depreciated, mistaken for the null character, the moral indigents, even the triumphant ones, also rises, but, with more difficulty. While there remain in the collective memory those doubts sown by offense, will always be diminished, as if a piece was missing, some portion of an inseparable value of their personality, their honor”.
For all of the above reasons, Mr. Flinto uses the present correspondence so Eni makes a PUBLIC RETRACTION, within a period of 15 (fifteen) days, counted from the receipt of this correspondence. This retraction should be made on the company's corporate website and also on the major news portals in both Italy and Brazil to undo slanderous and defamatory behavior against Mr. Flinto.
However, if Eni SpA do not do the mentioned Public Retraction, we inform that a "Criminal Complaint" will be made in Brazil against each of the people who are members of the Board of Directors of the company due to the practice of crimes against the honor of Mr. Flinto.
Thursday, June 01, 2017
In all these years, I've always said that the Italian oil giant demanded in Justice that the Brazilian Business Ethics Institute and I pay an indemnity of 30 million Euro.
But, I need to be fair with Eni. Actually, I was mistaken! The demanded indemnity is "just" 15 million Euro!!!
Note - Get to know:
a) "summary" of my 16 years story against Eni
b) "all the details" of my story with more than 50 supporting documents.
c) "3 versions of Eni" about my dismissal.
Thursday, May 25, 2017
Eni told “three different versions” about my dismissal. Each one more damaging and harmful than the other. In the first version, the company denies the “retaliation" after my complaint. In the second version, I did not colaborated with the confidential investigations. And in the third version, I am a “thief” and “opportunistic”.
1ª Version: CEO of Eni’s Brazilian operation (2002)
“I received your email of February 1st 2002 and we appreciate your congratulations and observations about the changes we promoted at the Cuiabá Regional. We find strange, however, your collocations that your dismissal from the company had occurred due to a “breach of trust”. That does not correspond to the reality of the facts. Your dismissal resulted from the administrative and organizational restructuring of the Cuiabá Regional. Being so that your contract was rescinded normally, with no just cause, having Agip even spontaneously maintained benefits after your dismissal, as, for instance, medical assistance extended to you and your dependents. We find unnecessary your references to Eni’s Code of Ethics, given that such have always been and always will be the master line of all of our actions”.
2ª Version: Lawsuit against me in Italy (2010)
“To make it easier the understanding of the eminent magistrate, I anticipate that, given the communication from Douglas Flinto, without having provided any documentary evidence to justify what was said, proposes an instrumental (functional) reconstruction of the causes that led to his dismissal, in 2001, from Agip Brazil and uses the Code of Ethics for the sole purpose of, repeatedly, defaming and openly discrediting the company. We also point out that from the insights made by Eni, it doesn’t appear that any retaliation was committed, nor a violation of the Law and, much less, the principles of Eni’s Code of Ethics, at the expense of the employee on the part of the former subsidiary Agip Brazil and, especially, on the part of Eni. On the other hand, it is important to emphasize that Douglas Flinto’s dismissal had full justification in his reticent and not collaborative conduct taken by the employee during the company’s undercover investigations that aimed to reveal potential harmful acts to the company itself, ceasing the trusting relationship”
3ª Version: Eni Shareholders’ Meeting (2017)
“The former employee was fired together with other actors of unlawful behavior, by reticence, for having violated the obligation of confidentiality and by trying to use instrumentally the Eni's Code of Ethics to gain personal advantages of the company"
It is evident that Eni, in all these years, doesn’t assume the truth of the facts: that I am a whistleblower; that I fulfilled the Code of Ethics; that I reported a millionaire scheme of fraud and corruption in Brazil and was fired in retaliation. On the other hand, Eni committed a mistake in my case, and it is still committing mistakes and not assuming them, preferring to denigrate even more my name, my honor and my reputation.
My fight against a giant continues!
Note 1 - My motivation: "I make Malala Yousafzai’s words my own: “I tell my story not because it is unique but because it is not”.
Note 2 - My objective: "I hope my story can be served as an example, motivation and inspiration to other whistleblowers who are being silenced and their careers and reputations buried around the world by companies that dont’t respect their codes of ethics, by employees and executives who steal corporate coffers and the board that pretends nothing happens".
Note 3 - I have evidence. Eni has not!: Details of my story with more than 50 supporting documents. These documents "prove" everything I've said in all this 16 years!
Tuesday, May 23, 2017
I’m a whistleblower of the Italian oil giant! My fight story against Eni will turn 16 years in the month of August 2017. My story was published in the book "Eni: The Parallel State” by journalists Andrea Greco and Giuseppe Oddo. Mr. Greco says that: “the authors decided to include your story because, after reading most of the documents you sent and talked with their sources, they convinced themselves that the story had roots, and that was right and interesting to include it in the context of 'Stato Parallelo'”.
Now, Mr. Mauro Meggiolaro is Eni’s Critical Shareholder (Fondazione Finanza Etica - Gruppo Banca Etica) and took my case to Eni Shareholder's Meeting (April 13, 2017).
I wrote 10 questions but, the Board of Eni did not answer each of my questions. The company preferred to answer all my questions in a long text, and so, Eni invented "new deceitful versions" about my story (Questions and answers before the Shareholders’ Meeting 2017 - Italian version - English translation forthcoming).
An example of Eni's lies about my case is that, in the only answer to my ten questions, Eni says at 2017 Eni’s Shareholder Meeting:
"Contrary on what was said Mr. Flinto, of Eni's in-depth analysis, following the communications received from Mr. Flinto in 2002, as well as represented by the Statutory Auditors in the Report of the Shareholder's Meeting informed in Eni's 2002 Balance Sheer, 'the former employee was dismissed, along with other actors of wrongful acts, for reticence, breach of confidentiality duty and the attempt to instrumentally use the Code of Ethics of Eni to take personal advantage of the company”.
I searched the internet and I found on Eni's website Eni 2002 Consolidated Results. This is the LINK to the "FULL" document (March 2003).
Eni continues to lie and to hide the truth! This type of attitude is part of the character of the company! Just look at the OPL 245 Case in Nigeria! Shell has already admitted illegal and unethical acts in the acquisition of OPL 245 and Eni’s Board of Directors continues to deny the irregularities.
Obviously there is nothing about my case. Eni continues to lie! Eni continues to denigrate my name, my honor, my image and my reputation!
I make Malala Yousafzai’s words my own: “I tell my story not because it is unique but because it is not” and I hope my story can be served as an example, motivation and inspiration to other whistleblowers who are being silenced and their careers and reputations buried around the world by companies that dont’t respect their codes of ethics, by employees and executives who steal corporate coffers and the board that pretends nothing happens.
My fight against a giant continues!
Note: I am sending you the details of my story with more than 50 supporting documents. These documents "prove" everything I've said in all this 16 years!
Monday, May 22, 2017
The Italian Justice must accept the complaint from the Public Ministry against the Italian oil giant Eni and its executives, including the current CEO and his predecessor.
They must all become "defendants" in a criminal lawsuit for "international corruption" for a billionaire bribe payment in the OPL 245 Case in Nigeria.
Until when will the Board of Eni continue with the "deceitful version" of this case?
Note: Read more about OPL 245 at Global Witness.
Tuesday, May 09, 2017
Get to know the history of the biggest corruption case in the corporate world involving Eni and Shell.
Read more at Bloomberg.
Friday, May 05, 2017
The Ikebiri community, from Bayelsa state, Nigeria, have launched an unprecedented legal case against the Italian oil giant Eni today seeking clean-up of, and compensation for damages from, an oil spill which has affected their community in the Niger Delta.
Supported by Friends of the Earth Europe and Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria, the Ikebiri community are calling for adequate compensation and clean-up of an oil spill dating back to 2010, which has yet to be addressed. The Italian oil giant ENI, which operates in Nigeria through its subsidiary Nigerian Agip Oil Company (NAOC), is responsible for the spill, caused by equipment failure.
This is Eni's Way!
Note: Read more in this LINK.
Thursday, April 20, 2017
Eni's Senior Executive is named "ambassador" in Qatar.
What's this? One more reason that confirms: the Italian oil giant is a "Parallel State"
Note: Read more "Eni: a company that is a state within a State" (first investigative book about Eni)
Tuesday, April 18, 2017
If you want a reliable indication of a company’s culture, just look at how the company treats employee concerns and whistleblowers. Recent events have highlighted serious failures on the part of major companies to address employee concerns and treat whistleblowers with some degree of respect.
Barclay Bank’s CEO was disciplined and suffered financial penalties for his improper attempts to identify a whistleblower who sent an anonymous complaint to the Barclay’s Board.
Wells Fargo is alleged to have fired several managers and employees after they raised specific concerns about the sales incentive program.
You have to ask yourself – what the heck are these companies doing?
Given today’s enforcement environment and focus on protecting whistleblowers and employees who raise concerns, it is surprising to see companies retaliating against whistleblowers and employees. In general, we have seen little progress in corporate handling of employee concerns and in particular non-retaliation against whistleblowers. Offending companies deserve every penny of punishment and reputational damage from retaliating against employees.
In the Barclay’s case, the CEO enlisted the bank’s security office to identify the anonymous whistleblower who sent two letters to Barclay’s board alleging prior misconduct by a close colleague of the CEO who had worked with the CEO at his former bank. The CEO explained in his subsequent apology:
In my desire to protect our colleague, however, I got too personally involved in this matter. My hope was that if we found out who was sending these letters we could try and get them to stop the harassment of a person who did not deserve that treatment. Nevertheless, I realise that I should simply have the compliance function handle this matter, as they were doing. This was a mistake on my part and I apologise for it.
The challenge for companies like Barclays and Wells Fargo is how to start rebuilding a culture of trust where employees feel comfortable raising concerns without fear of retaliation. Without a real commitment to encouraging employee concerns, most employees are suspicious and reluctant to raise concerns. It is a difficult to overcome employee reluctance.
The challenge for companies like Barclays and Wells Fargo is even more daunting when employees who raised concerns are terminated or investigated by the CEO.
In the case of Wells Fargo, the Department of Labor is investigating the company for whistleblower violations of Dodd-Frank and Sarbanes-Oxley. In one case, a Wells Fargo manager was fired within 20 days of raising a complaint. The reason for the firing cited by the bank was a previously discredited complaint about a manager’s alleged drinking behavior.
A speak up culture requires the commitment of the board, the CEO and senior executive management. Concrete actions have to be taken to establish credibility for an employee communications program.
Barclays has a real credibility program – the offending CEO cannot turn around and tell employees that he wants to hear their concerns. As he demonstrated, he is more interested in the identity of the whistleblower than responding to the substance of the concern.
Similarly, Wells Fargo’s firing of employees who complained about the abusive sales incentive program creates a manifest culture of distrust. To repair such a culture will take time, commitment, and specific actions by leadership, mid-level managers and staff. Until such remediation occurs, Wells Fargo will continue to suffer from a culture where employees are reluctant to raise specific concerns.
Actions always speak louder than words and companies who have suffered serious retaliation issues can only restore trust with meaningful actions and specific commitments.